Can You Skip Type 1 and Go Directly to Type 2?

An enterprise customer is ready to proceed: your software product has passed the technical evaluation and pricing discussions are complete. Then procurement requests your latest SOC 2 report. You have nothing to send.

When Australian SaaS companies enter larger markets, this situation presents an immediate challenge. Because security assurance takes time, rushing into the wrong assessment may not satisfy the customer’s requirements. Understanding what the buyer expects, and planning backward from the deadline, is where the solution begins.

First, find out exactly what was asked for, and by when, without rushing. It’s worth asking before assuming, since the request sometimes leaves more room than it first appears.

Start by Learning Which SOC 2 Report Is Required

SOC 2 reports don’t all provide the same level of assurance. Enterprise security requirements make the distinction between SOC 2 type 1 vs type 2 matter. Type 1 evaluates whether relevant controls are suitably designed at a particular date. Over a defined period, Type 2 examines both their design and their operating effectiveness.

An enterprise buyer may accept Type 1 temporarily, but many specifically request Type 2 because it provides evidence covering actual operations. Prior to commissioning an examination, confirm with the customer the report type, the required scope, and acceptable reporting dates.

Write the answers down, since the report type, scope, and dates all drive the plan and the budget. If the customer’s requirements are unclear, ask for the exact wording in the contract or the security questionnaire.

Why the Observation Period Shapes Your Timeline

A SOC 2 type 2 examination cannot be completed simply by preparing documentation and scheduling an auditor. The relevant controls have to be in operation across the whole reporting period. That period may cover three months for an initial examination, while subsequent reports commonly examine longer periods.

Access reviews, security training, or change approvals that your business needs to demonstrate must occur and be documented during the applicable window. Whether the requested report can realistically be delivered on time becomes clearer when you plan backward from a customer deadline.

Tell the customer early if the deadline is tighter than the observation period allows. Hearing about the gap early, some customers are willing to discuss interim steps such as a dated plan.

What Exactly Are You Paying For?

Although SOC 2 does not issue certificates, businesses frequently search for SOC 2 type 2 certification.

A licensed CPA firm issues an attestation report after performing an independent examination against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria. The assessed system, relevant controls, testing procedures, and the auditor’s opinion are all described in the report.

It’s that document, often shared under a confidentiality agreement, that customers typically review. A specific historical period is also what a SOC type 2 report relates to. Assurance about every change made afterward isn’t automatically included.

Costs to Know About Before You Begin

More than an independent examination fee is involved in SOC 2 preparation. Assistance with developing policies, conducting risk assessments, preparing evidence, training employees, and arranging security testing may be needed.

For businesses with up to 50 employees, Siege Cyber advertises a SOC 2 compliance package at AUD $2,750 per month, excluding GST, over twelve months. The advertised offer applies to eligible contracts signed by December 31, 2026. Compliance preparation, training, a compliance platform, and external penetration testing are included in its package.

Billed separately is the independent CPA examination, with Siege Cyber indicating typical fees of approximately AUD 5,000–15,000, depending on scope and complexity. Before committing, confirm current pricing, eligibility, and deliverables.

When Your Report Is Already Out of Date

Say your Type 2 report covers January through June, yet a customer requests assurance in October. The months in between aren’t examined by the report. A management-issued bridge letter describing relevant changes since the reporting period ended may be acceptable to some customers.

Acceptance depends on the customer’s requirements, however, and a bridge letter does not replace an independent examination. Rather than assuming an older report will satisfy procurement, discuss reporting gaps early.

Get More From Your Compliance Investment Than One Contract

Australian-based SOC 2 readiness support, with fixed-price consulting packages and independent audit coordination, is provided by Siege Cyber. The most useful approach for growing software companies is to connect compliance preparation with actual operational responsibilities.

Control owners should be assigned, security records maintained, and a reporting schedule established to support future customer reviews. A successful SOC 2 project prepares your business for the next enterprise opportunity as well as answering the current request.

The next audit cycle is less of a scramble when the evidence you collect has been kept organized from the start.

Scroll to Top